The European Union approves the Digital Services Act, a proposal to protect consumers and their privacy, in a move that could pave the way for similar legislation in the United States. Illegal activities are still thriving, but at one point the UN was slow to respond to evolving digital threats. In 2021, losses from cybercrime will set an all-time high. Online users are losing nearly US$7 billion in dividends in cybercrime, with large corporations and public individuals as common funds for digital attacks. Whether large-scale attacks or phishing attacks targeting an individual user, online crime is on the rise – prompting the EU to act quickly to combat this preoccupied trend.
Since the US government has not enacted universal policies to protect consumers, some companies have marketed privacy as a tool. Or Apple has introduced a range of means to protect users from predatory companies that collect data for purposes such as targeted advertising. The company’s iPhone privacy report shows what information is collected by apps and sites that ask for user data. It has specific information, such as which sensors and internet domains are used during the tasks, and can inform people whether applications or sites are specified exactly as the data collected. The resources can be helpful, they are limited to Apple devices. Meanwhile, the new EU law will be applied to a wide range of companies, sites and services.
The deal was announced by the European Commission and approved by the European Parliament and EU member states, the committee said. The Digital Services Act was introduced for the first time in 2020 and has established firm rules for digital companies. †The DSA updates the ground rules for all online services in the EUEuropean Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in a statement.The bigger or bigger, the bigger the responsibilities of the online platform.“The legislation sets expectations for many online sites and services – intermediary services, hosting services, online platforms and ‘very large’ online platforms – all of which must comply with users’ privacy rights and fight illegal activities.
“Very large” online platforms – which they define as those that attract more than 10% of Europe’s 450 million consumers – have the most legal restrictions under the Digital Services Act, as we must actively work to prevent cybercrime on their platforms. to curb. This includes sharing data with authorities, third-party audits and the option for users not to receive specific recommendations based on quality creation. Other parents apply to all digital services covered by the law, such as transparency reports, service contract requirements that protect user rights, and cooperation with national authorities.
Some of the guidelines introduced under the Digital Services Act are present in the US thanks to the efforts of private companies, such as Apple. For example, some versions of the company’s software include transparency reports and protection against cybercrime, but not all legal provisions are voluntarily included by digital service providers. Apple’s app streaming transparency resources would cost social media giants just under $10 billion in receipts, according to a Financial times historical. Among businesses, Facebook was the most biased by privacy-focused sources.
The voluntary means that protect consumers will never be universally accepted by big tech, once there is little profit to be gained from collecting, selling and marketing user data. The corporations ultimately report to their shareholders and must take measures that will benefit this group the most. So that the UN really has privacy rights, the government should take measures similar to the EU Digital Services Act.
Source: European Commission 1, 2, Financial times